ALJ says "ABSOLUTELY NOT" (California) (California)

Share your different, weird, exciting or interesting stories from the trenches!

ALJ says "ABSOLUTELY NOT" (California) (California)

Postby steve appell on Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:51 pm

ITEM:
Both def & lien claimant yesterday at trial requested a joint continuance.......in NOCAL.
The ALJ said "Absolutely not. Your going to settle today or going to trial today."

REACTION:
How refreshing !

PS:
This was not my case.
Last edited by steve appell on Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve

appellandassociates.com
6311 Van Nuys Bl #480
Van Nuys, Ca 91401
wcexaminer@aol.com


Check out 'WORK COMP MATTERS" Free PODCAST below
https://www.workcompcentral.com/educati ... ype=online
User avatar
steve appell
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm

Re: ALJ says "ABSOLUTELY NOT" (California) (California) (Califor

Postby steve appell on Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:52 pm

Mistake
Steve

appellandassociates.com
6311 Van Nuys Bl #480
Van Nuys, Ca 91401
wcexaminer@aol.com


Check out 'WORK COMP MATTERS" Free PODCAST below
https://www.workcompcentral.com/educati ... ype=online
User avatar
steve appell
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm

Re: ALJ says "ABSOLUTELY NOT" (California) (California)

Postby jpod on Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:35 pm

Was it San Jose?

Years ago the PJ told a lien claimant flat out, you will not get any calendar time for your dispute go outside and settle. The dispute was over the billing which I considered excessive. I had paid the usual and customary fee for AME interpreters and would not pay anymore, in fact I would be demanding return of funds paid.

The interrpeter, I had learned, was the applicant's attorney's sister, and yes the fees were for an AME exam. Once outside I told the interpreter to have a nice day and that I considered the matter closed.
jpod
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:21 pm

Re: ALJ says "ABSOLUTELY NOT" (California) (California)

Postby steve appell on Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:20 pm

Hi Jpod !
Feel free to send me a "PM" for the specifics. However, the main point I was addressing was the difference between NOCAL & SOCAL.........Unfortunately in SOCAL, a continuance is more the rule than the exception.
Steve

appellandassociates.com
6311 Van Nuys Bl #480
Van Nuys, Ca 91401
wcexaminer@aol.com


Check out 'WORK COMP MATTERS" Free PODCAST below
https://www.workcompcentral.com/educati ... ype=online
User avatar
steve appell
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm

Re: ALJ says "ABSOLUTELY NOT" (California) (California)

Postby rbaird on Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:15 pm

Good yarn, Steve. Sometimes I took a hard line on lien trials, sometimes I would grant a continuance (underscore) for good cause shown. A lot of people don't understand the complexities of good calendar management, but it is one of the factors supervisors look at, particularly if someone goes to a PJ with a tale of woe or if the WCALJ buys himself or herself a recon, whether or not the initial call was "right". There is a difference between practice between the South of the Tehachipis and the North but that's a topic for another day. (By the way, before I retired, I think I got pretty good at getting settlements in these cases, although JPod's case is not the kind that can readily be resolved short of a decision.)
rbaird
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:04 pm


Return to War Stories

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest