Still confused about Add-On (California)

Ask your AMA Guide questions to Dr. Chris Brigham. Christopher R. Brigham, MD is recognized as the nation's leading expert, author, and trainer on the Guides ( We have expanded this category to include other rating questions under both new and old schedules.

Still confused about Add-On (California)

Postby rosellavera on Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:19 pm

If the IW gets an impairment of 8% based on Lumbar DRE CAT II, which according to the AMA Guides "each category includes a range to account for the resolution or continuation of symptoms and their impact on the ability to perform ADL", can a doctor add an additional 1% to the 8%? The doctor states: "based on the reported symptoms as they affect his activities of daily living, I would add an additional 1% disability." It appears to me that this has already been factored into the 8%, Am I wrong?
User avatar
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Still confused about Add-On (California)

Postby denyse on Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:54 pm

DEU will rate it. I am fairly certain there is no case law - probably due to the low monetary value. I like to use page 570 (top second column) where it discusses how pain is used to increase DRE. I think you are right, but acknowledge the real world. The problem is not your case, it is when a doctor gives 3 DRE's and a 3% increase (that's +12). Query, if DRE is increased for pain and impact on ADL, isn't that limited to 3% per injury in Cali (page 1-12, PDRS)?
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:10 pm

Return to AMA Guides & Ratings

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest