Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

The filing and enforcement of liens (different states refer to these with different terms) to secure payment for services or goods against a workers' compensation award is complex and filled with special rules - this category is for questions and discussion of this special area of work comp law.

Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby LawAdvocate on Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:45 am

So as a person who always serves documents to lien claimants as required - this is a vent and a redundant question - why does the defense community let these lien reps get away with saying "we served it to your client?"

Sorry Charlie, CCR 10770 says you serve it to my client and the defense attorney of records. Time to put an end to this excuse. 10770 clearly states you serve the DA the lien and documents in support of your lien.
LawAdvocate
 
Posts: 938
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:55 am

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby vampireinthenight on Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:05 am

What do you ask as a remedy?
User avatar
vampireinthenight
 
Posts: 916
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:53 am

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby steve appell on Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:09 pm

I know my eyesight is poor, but I do not see this requirement in R&R 10770. Can you please clarify?
Steve

appellandassociates.com
6311 Van Nuys Bl #480
Van Nuys, Ca 91401
wcexaminer@aol.com


Check out 'WORK COMP MATTERS" Free PODCAST below
https://www.workcompcentral.com/educati ... ype=online
User avatar
steve appell
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby jpod on Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:31 pm

I think he is referring to the item under section (d)(1)(B) although I am not sure I followed the outline tree correctly. The section states:
starting with (d) (1)

...All original and amended lien claims... ...shall be served on:
(B) any employer(s) or insurance carrier(s) that are parties to the case and , if represented their attorney(s) or other agent(s) of record...."

Again I may have gotten the outline tree wrong.
jpod
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:21 pm

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby steve appell on Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:45 pm

Yes I did see that. I suspect the Lien Reps are saying when the defendant was originally served, there was no DA of record at that time. Therefore, subsequent service on def att is not necessary.... BUT ALAS..... I will wait for LA to confirm.
Steve

appellandassociates.com
6311 Van Nuys Bl #480
Van Nuys, Ca 91401
wcexaminer@aol.com


Check out 'WORK COMP MATTERS" Free PODCAST below
https://www.workcompcentral.com/educati ... ype=online
User avatar
steve appell
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby LawAdvocate on Fri Jul 01, 2016 9:15 am

The reg does not say that. Just as Defense is required to serve you as soon as you become known to the, the reverse applies, if never relieves you because you have served my client when I was not a party to not serve me when I become a party. I am winning adverse inferences with disallowances of liens and the lien reps stand there and look at me like they just met a Martian.

My theory remains, if you can't play with the big dogs, get back on the porch.

I answered an email yesterday to yet another lien claimant who didn't want to discuss the facts of the case just walk away with money in the "spirit" of Compromise. I advised him the "spirit" of Compromise is formulated on the fee schedule amount of their bill multiplied by my chances of losing. This lien rep made some of the most intellectually dishonest arguments I have ever seen. So for kicks and giggles I educated him on the law.

What I suggest is that Defendants abide by 10608, because the evidence is what it is. If you owe pay, if you don't say no, stop throwing money at the same group of providers who exhibit bad behavior. Stop rewarding bad behavior, make an offer that reflects the strength of your defense. Then absent evidence that rebuts your defense, drop your offers at every appearance or for every phone call. I have a case with Medical Lien Mgmt where I finally realized they had called me 10 times. I told them I was going to drop my offer by $50 each time. When I get to the lien conference the offer is going to be $1 or withdraw your lien.
LawAdvocate
 
Posts: 938
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:55 am

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby chirple on Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:37 am

I agree. We need to stand up to the frivolous collection efforts where the lien claimant is relying on the premise that it is more cost effective for us to settle than repeatedly appear. Drop your offer at each hearing. Reputations spread like wildfire.

If you owe it, pay it, don't litigate. But, if you don't owe, and you have a client who is willing, stand your ground.

If we could only apply CCP998 to workers' compensation lien collection efforts.
chirple
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:09 am

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby lacompfun on Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:07 pm

Maybe tell the lien claimants no service of documents on defense counsel then no settlement. I have tried this on some and they sent me the discovery documents.

My theory is they know it should be sent. They do not as too much work and hope the defense will settle.
lacompfun
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:58 am

Re: Lien Claimant service to DAs (California)

Postby LawAdvocate on Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:14 pm

My new tactic is to list the issue - LC failure to comply with CCR 10770 (d)(1)(B) and then object to the admissibility of any documents not served to my office prior to or at the lien conference. Working well so far.
LawAdvocate
 
Posts: 938
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:55 am


Return to Liens

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron