Stipulation ptc statement (California)

This category is meant for discussion of technical legal issues in workers' compensation. If you are an injured worker, do not ask questions here. Go to the Injured Workers' forum.

Stipulation ptc statement (California)

Postby lacompfun on Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:35 pm


Ptc statement page 1 parties stipulate to aww at $300 a week.

Case set for trial.

No trial off calendar

2 years later case set for trial again. AA produces earnings at $450 week. Lists that as aww. Defense says aww is $300 prior stipulation.


1. For trial what would judge decide aww?
Last edited by lacompfun on Thu Sep 20, 2018 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:58 am

Re: Stipulation ptp statement (California)

Postby LawAdvocate on Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:24 am

The judge is going to go with the best evidence which is a wage statement. Obfuscating over a technicality is not looked upon kindly. The prior PTCS is not binding on anyone, as discovery of new evidence means you comply with those facts.
Posts: 1144
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:55 am

Re: Stipulation ptp statement (California)

Postby vampireinthenight on Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:28 am

Stipulation is kind of weak if the trial did not happen. OTOC usually means discovery is re-opened.

A stipulation is stronger if it is associated with an award (approved) or a finding of fact on the other issues (again, implicitly approved when it is read into the minutes).

It might be worth pursuing but, in the face of contrary evidence, I would anticipate the WCJ will not enforce the stipulation.
User avatar
Posts: 1088
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:53 am

Re: Stipulation ptp statement (California)

Postby lacompfun on Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:48 am

Thank you
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:58 am

Re: Stipulation ptc statement (California)

Postby mytwocents on Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:53 am

We're supposed to be doing substantial justice here; not playing games of "gotcha." The employer should know what his AWW was based on payroll records. If it was $450 a week, agree to pay him accordingly if he prevails. If it was $300 and he's claiming tips or under the table or something else that wasn't recorded, that's a different story.
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:58 pm

Return to Legal

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests